Ask three different sources how a due date is calculated and you might get three different answers, because there genuinely are three distinct methods in common clinical use — dating from the last menstrual period, dating from an early ultrasound, and, for pregnancies conceived through IVF, dating from the embryo transfer date. Each method has a different level of precision, and knowing which one applies to your situation helps make sense of the number you've been given.
The standard estimate — commonly called Naegele's Rule — adds 280 days (40 weeks) to the first day of your last period. The underlying assumption is a 28-day cycle with ovulation on day 14.
Reasonably reliable if your cycles are regular and close to 28 days. Accuracy drops noticeably with cycle lengths outside the 26–32 day range, irregular cycles, or uncertainty about the exact LMP date.
An initial estimate at the very first prenatal visit, before any scan has been done.
Between roughly 6 and 13 weeks, crown-rump length (CRL) is measured on ultrasound and matched against standardized fetal growth tables to estimate gestational age directly from the size of the embryo or fetus.
The most accurate non-IVF method available — typically within 3 to 5 days when performed in this window. Its precision falls off in later pregnancy, so a scan done after the first trimester is far less reliable for dating purposes, though still useful for monitoring growth.
Correcting or confirming the LMP-based estimate. When the two disagree by more than about a week, obstetric guidelines generally recommend the scan date takes precedence.
For pregnancies achieved through IVF, the exact age of the embryo at transfer is known (typically transferred as either a day-3 cleavage-stage embryo or a day-5 blastocyst). The due date is calculated by adding the remaining gestation to the known transfer date and embryo age — for example, a day-5 blastocyst transfer is treated as being 5 days past ovulation on the day of transfer.
The most precise dating method of all, since there's no ambiguity about ovulation or fertilization timing — the exact conception window is a matter of clinical record rather than estimation.
Any pregnancy conceived via IVF. This date should generally be used in preference to both LMP and ultrasound dating, since it removes the main source of error present in the other two methods.
Here's how they generally rank in terms of reliability, from least to most precise:
In routine obstetric care, whichever method gives the most precise information for your situation is the one that should be documented as your official due date — and once set from a reliable early method, it's not typically revised again later in pregnancy based on growth scans alone.
It's worth separating two different things that both involve ultrasound. Early dating scans (6–13 weeks) establish or correct your due date. Later growth scans (after about 20 weeks) check whether the baby is tracking appropriately for the due date that's already been set. If a third-trimester scan shows the baby measuring a week or two off from the established date, that's typically interpreted as a growth variation — bigger or smaller than average — not a signal to move the due date itself. Confusing these two purposes is one of the most common reasons people think their due date is "changing" repeatedly when really only the growth interpretation is being updated.
As a general guide:
To see how each of these methods plays out for your specific dates — and get a week-by-week milestone breakdown alongside the estimate — RxMedCalc's pregnancy due date calculator supports all three inputs (LMP, ultrasound, and IVF transfer date), so you can compare the estimates side by side rather than relying on a single generic calculation.
Whichever method applies to you, remember that a due date is a statistical estimate of the middle of a normal delivery window — full term spans 37 to 42 weeks — not a fixed appointment. Its real clinical value is in anchoring the timing of your screening tests and antenatal checkups, which is exactly why getting it as accurate as possible early on is worth the effort.